00
Sector dossier · FIN
Finance teams use RhodeCode for compliance, audit, and data residency.
Trading systems, ledgers and settlement code under change control that has to satisfy internal audit and a regulator who does not accept “the tool does not support that”.
Profile
Typical deployment
Regulation
MiFID II · SOX · DORA
Repositories
2,000–8,000
Binding constraint
Segregation of duties, provable
VCS mix
Git + legacy SVN in risk
01
Constraints
The constraint you arrived with is not unique to you
Which controls each sector treats as a hard requirement, which are common, and which rarely apply. Your row is highlighted.
hard requirement common not typical
| Sector | Air-gapped | Export control | Path-level access | Signed approvals | IT/OT or zone split | Long audit retention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FINFinancial services | Air-gapped: not typical | Export control: hard requirement | Path-level access: hard requirement | Signed approvals: hard requirement | IT/OT or zone split: not typical | Long audit retention: hard requirement |
| DEFDefence & government | Air-gapped: hard requirement | Export control: hard requirement | Path-level access: hard requirement | Signed approvals: common | IT/OT or zone split: hard requirement | Long audit retention: hard requirement |
| AUTAutomotive & embedded | Air-gapped: not typical | Export control: common | Path-level access: hard requirement | Signed approvals: hard requirement | IT/OT or zone split: hard requirement | Long audit retention: common |
| MEDHealthcare & life sciences | Air-gapped: not typical | Export control: not typical | Path-level access: hard requirement | Signed approvals: hard requirement | IT/OT or zone split: not typical | Long audit retention: hard requirement |
| SCIResearch & national labs | Air-gapped: hard requirement | Export control: common | Path-level access: common | Signed approvals: common | IT/OT or zone split: not typical | Long audit retention: common |
| AERAerospace & space | Air-gapped: hard requirement | Export control: hard requirement | Path-level access: hard requirement | Signed approvals: hard requirement | IT/OT or zone split: hard requirement | Long audit retention: common |
| ENREnergy & utilities | Air-gapped: hard requirement | Export control: hard requirement | Path-level access: common | Signed approvals: common | IT/OT or zone split: hard requirement | Long audit retention: common |
| TELTelecom | Air-gapped: not typical | Export control: common | Path-level access: hard requirement | Signed approvals: common | IT/OT or zone split: common | Long audit retention: hard requirement |
| SEMSemiconductor & IP | Air-gapped: hard requirement | Export control: hard requirement | Path-level access: hard requirement | Signed approvals: common | IT/OT or zone split: hard requirement | Long audit retention: hard requirement |
| GAMGames & interactive | Air-gapped: not typical | Export control: not typical | Path-level access: hard requirement | Signed approvals: common | IT/OT or zone split: not typical | Long audit retention: common |
01a
Needs
What the platform has to do here
Four requirements this reader cannot compromise on, and the shape of answer that fails them.
01
Reviewer rules encode segregation of duties as a platform rule, not a policy document
02
Immutable audit trail with long retention, streamed to your SIEM
03
IP-restricted access for contractors and offshore teams
04
Explicit deny survives group membership changes at offboarding
Where the usual answer fails
Cloud-only platforms cannot answer where settlement code physically resides, and Git-only tools leave the legacy risk code outside the audit boundary entirely.
02
Cases
How that works in practice
02.1
Compliance posture you can audit
RhodeCode is built for environments where SOC 2 and ISO 27001 reviewers ask hard questions about source control. Hosting on your own infrastructure keeps the data-flow diagram short and the answers verifiable.
02.2
Audit logging and change traceability
Every push, review and permission change is recorded. Approval rules tie each merge to a named reviewer, so the trail from change request to production is documented rather than reconstructed.
02.3
Data residency by default
Run RhodeCode in the region your business operates in, on hardware your security team signed off. There is no required cloud component and no telemetry — residency follows the machine rather than a vendor policy.
02.4
Fine-grained access and SSO
Plug into the identity systems the bank already runs — LDAP, Active Directory, SAML, OAuth — with per-repository and per-branch permissions, IP allowlists and scoped auth tokens.
03
Next
Tell us the constraint, not the feature list
Deployments in this shape usually turn on one binding constraint. Describe yours and we will say plainly whether RhodeCode answers it — including when it does not.